<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talk Nation &#187; Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talknation.org/category/elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talknation.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Speechifying matters&#8230;except when it doesn&#8217;t.</title>
		<link>http://talknation.org/2008/09/03/speechifying-mattersexcept-when-it-doesnt/</link>
		<comments>http://talknation.org/2008/09/03/speechifying-mattersexcept-when-it-doesnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Wing Hate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talknation.org/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK so Sarah Palin, aka Annie Oakley, comes out and delivers an eloquent assault on Barack Obama for his lack of experience (and when it comes to lack of experience she&#8217;s certainly familiar with the condition) and she does it with wit and eloquence (though the speech was written before she was even selected and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so Sarah Palin, aka Annie Oakley, comes out and delivers an eloquent assault on Barack Obama for his lack of experience (and when it comes to lack of experience she&#8217;s certainly familiar with the condition) and she does it with wit and eloquence (<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2008/09/putting_words_in_palins_mouth.html">though the speech was written before she was even selected and only edited a bit to &#8220;feminize&#8221; it some</a>) and now commenters are starting to tell us that it is a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/sarah-palin-makes-it-a-ra_b_123765.html">sure sign that she&#8217;s ready for the bigtime</a> because she&#8217;s so poised and eloquent and called Barack Obama names.</p>
<p>Right.</p>
<p>And the Republicans, including their aged candidate, blow their collective gaskets hammering at us over and over again with the idea that eloquence and good speechifying aren&#8217;t enough to qualify someone for a position in the Executive Branch or for President (and make no mistake, a VP better be qualified for that job or not get selected).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talknation.org/2008/09/03/speechifying-mattersexcept-when-it-doesnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush, sociopath?</title>
		<link>http://talknation.org/2007/07/02/george-bush-sociopath/</link>
		<comments>http://talknation.org/2007/07/02/george-bush-sociopath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Imperial Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talknation.org/2007/07/02/george-bush-sociopath/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, here&#8217;s John Edwards statement about Bush&#8217;s disdain for the law of the land.
&#8220;Only a president clinically incapable of understanding that mistakes have consequences could take the action he did today. President Bush has just sent exactly the wrong signal to the country and the world. In George Bush&#8217;s America, it is apparently okay to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, here&#8217;s John Edwards statement about Bush&#8217;s disdain for the law of the land.<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-family: arial;">&#8220;Only a president clinically incapable of understanding that mistakes have consequences could take the action he did today. President Bush has just sent exactly the wrong signal to the country and the world. In George Bush&#8217;s America, it is apparently okay to misuse intelligence for political gain, mislead prosecutors and lie to the FBI. George Bush and his cronies think they are above the law and the rest of us live with the consequences. The cause of equal justice in America took a serious blow today.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>So Edwards considers Bush &#8220;clinically incapable of understanding that mistakes have consequences&#8221;.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s look at a <a href="http://www.hss.caltech.edu/%7Emcafee/Bin/sb.htm">clinical profile of a sociopath</a><br />
<blockquote>
<h3><font style="font-family: verdana,tahoma,arial;">Profile of the Sociopath</font></h3>
<p><font style="font-family: verdana,tahoma,arial;">This website summarizes some of the common features of descriptions of the behavior of sociopaths.  </font></p>
<ul><font style="font-family: verdana,tahoma,arial;">
<li><b>Glibness and Superficial Charm</b>  </p>
</li>
<li><b>Manipulative and Conning <br />They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims. </b>
</li>
<li><b>Grandiose Sense of Self <br />Feels entitled to certain things as &#8220;their right.&#8221;</b>
</li>
<li><b>Pathological Lying <br />Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests. </b>
</li>
<li><b>Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt <br />A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.</b>
</li>
<li><b>Shallow Emotions <br />When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises. </b>
</li>
<li>Incapacity for Love  </li>
<li>Need for Stimulation <br />Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal.  Promiscuity and gambling are common.
</li>
<li><b>Callousness/Lack of Empathy <br />Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others&#8217; feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.</b>
</li>
<li>Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature <br />Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.
</li>
<li><b>Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency <br />Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet &#8220;gets by&#8221; by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc. </b>
</li>
<li><b>Irresponsibility/Unreliability <br />Not concerned about wrecking others&#8217; lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.</b>
</li>
<li>Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity <br />Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.
</li>
<li><b>Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle <br />Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.</b>
</li>
<li><b>Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility <br />Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution.  Changes life story readily.</b> </li>
<p></font></ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Sociopathic behavior indeed&#8230;this is what America has been reduced to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talknation.org/2007/07/02/george-bush-sociopath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Virginia, Democrats haven&#8217;t lost because they were anti-war&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://talknation.org/2006/10/30/no-virginia-democrats-havent-lost-because-they-were-anti-war/</link>
		<comments>http://talknation.org/2006/10/30/no-virginia-democrats-havent-lost-because-they-were-anti-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The invasion/occupation of Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talknation.org/2006/10/30/no-virginia-democrats-havent-lost-because-they-were-anti-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mahablog has it best and her history is as I remember it.  McGovern didn&#8217;t lose because he was anti-war, Nixon&#8217;s entire campaign was based on the claim that he was the one best suited to end the war.  Plus, Reagan didn&#8217;t run against Carter the peacenik, he ran against Carter as, believe it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/30/dont-blame-mcgovern-ii/">Mahablog has it best</a> and her history is as I remember it.  McGovern didn&#8217;t lose because he was anti-war, Nixon&#8217;s entire campaign was based on the claim that <i>he</i> was the one best suited to end the war.  Plus, Reagan didn&#8217;t run against Carter the peacenik, he ran against Carter as, believe it or not, the budget buster.  Reagan spent the final weeks of the campaign reminding everyone that Jimmy Carter had a [gasp] $60 billion budget deficit.  Of course as you all no doubt remember, Reagan never did manage to be that frugal.</p>
<p>Yet the lies and misinformation about Democrats persists, pushed by the Republicans who no doubt believe the myths themselves and by a media too lazy and historically ignorant to do anything but be willing stenographers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/30/dont-blame-mcgovern-ii/">From Maha</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>George McGovern did not lose the 1972 presidential election because he called for withdrawal from Vietnam. I repeat, George McGovern did not lose the 1972 presidential election because he called for withdrawal from Vietnam.</p>
<p>How do I know this? Simple. In 1972, both bleeping major party candidates â€” Republican Nixon and Democrat McGovern â€” were calling for a bleeping withdrawal from bleeping Vietnam.</p>
<p>The Vietnam issue in 1972 was not at all parallel to the pro-war and anti-war positions people are taking now. In 1972, a substantial majority of the electorate recognized the course was unstayable and wanted it to end. And in 1972, President Richard bleeping Nixon and his Secretary of State, the motherbleeping Henry Kissinger, tried frantically to end the war before the 1972 elections. The Nixon-Kissinger â€œOctober surpriseâ€ was the announcement of a peace settlement with North Vietnam (which fell through after the elections).</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talknation.org/2006/10/30/no-virginia-democrats-havent-lost-because-they-were-anti-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If only we had a real media, that reported real news, that actually understood the issues [sigh]</title>
		<link>http://talknation.org/2006/10/29/if-only-we-had-a-real-media-that-reported-real-news-that-actually-understood-the-issues-sigh/</link>
		<comments>http://talknation.org/2006/10/29/if-only-we-had-a-real-media-that-reported-real-news-that-actually-understood-the-issues-sigh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talknation.org/2006/10/29/if-only-we-had-a-real-media-that-reported-real-news-that-actually-understood-the-issues-sigh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But we don&#8217;t of course, and Jamison Foser over at MediaMatters really nails them to the wall with this one.  If only we could hold the media accountable, even in the imperfect way we get to hold politicians accountable.
So please &#8212; please &#8212; use these last 10 days well. Use them to educate your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we don&#8217;t of course, and Jamison Foser over at MediaMatters really nails them to the wall with <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200610270018">this one</a>.  If only we could hold the media accountable, even in the imperfect way we get to hold politicians accountable.</p>
<blockquote><p>So please &#8212; please &#8212; use these last 10 days well. Use them to educate your readers and viewers and listeners about the things that really matter. Use the next 10 days to help people understand what the candidates want to do about Iraq and whether their solutions have worked in the past. About how we&#8217;ve failed to capture Osama bin Laden and what we&#8217;re doing to change that. About what is happening in Afghanistan, about port security, about the budget deficit, about wage stagnation, about runaway energy costs, and about health care.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just use this time to play an RNC ad &#8212; or a DNC ad, or any ad &#8212; over and over and over and over again. Voters will see these ads; the parties and candidates are paying for voters to see them. That&#8217;s the whole point of an ad. Voters don&#8217;t need you to air these ads nonstop, for free. The parties want you to do that. You&#8217;re doing their bidding. You&#8217;re telling voters about campaign tactics rather than issues. But campaign tactics don&#8217;t keep us safe, don&#8217;t keep our troops from dying needlessly in Iraq, don&#8217;t put food on the table, and don&#8217;t help people get health care.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, if only.  We can always dream I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talknation.org/2006/10/29/if-only-we-had-a-real-media-that-reported-real-news-that-actually-understood-the-issues-sigh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
